European Court of Human Rights
  • The News ECHR
  • Case of the Day
  • Your Case
  • Top 50
  • About
 
No Result
View All Result
  • The News ECHR
  • Case of the Day
  • Your Case
  • Top 50
  • About
No Result
View All Result
European Court of Human Rights
No Result
View All Result

New Judgment: National Security vs. Rights of Foreigners

admin by admin
December 5, 2023
in Case of the Day
Bosnian refugees in Croatia in 1990s.

Bosnian refugees in Croatia in 1990s.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Today, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled against Croatia, which violated the rights of a stateless man who was expelled from the country after the security service deemed him a national security threat. The judgment addressed the delicate balance between national security interests and the procedural rights of aliens under international human rights law.

The applicant is a former stateless individual and later a national of Bosnia and Herzegovina, from Croatia. He had lived in Croatia since childhood and applied for Croatian citizenship. However, the application was rejected following a negative security assessment by the national intelligence agency. Subsequently, the applicant was expelled from Croatia on grounds of national security, a decision for which substantive reasons were not provided, as they were based on classified information.

The applicant challenged the decisions at various levels of the Croatian judicial system, including the Constitutional Court, all of which upheld the expulsion and the denial of citizenship. The applicant then approached the ECHR, alleging a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which concerns the procedural safeguards relating to the expulsion of aliens.

In its judgment, the ECHR examined the compatibility of the Croatian government’s actions with the Convention’s safeguards. It focused on the lack of disclosure of reasons for the applicant’s expulsion and the consequent impact on the ability to challenge the decision effectively. The Court underscored the significance of procedural rights and the need for their protection, even in the context of national security.

The ECHR found that while states have a margin of appreciation in national security matters, the procedural limitations imposed on the applicant were not sufficiently counterbalanced by the Croatian authorities. The Court observed that the applicant was not provided with the factual basis for the assessment that posed a national security threat, which constituted a significant limitation of procedural rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 7.

The ruling is significant for several reasons. First, it reinforces the principle that while states may have legitimate national security concerns, these do not grant carte blanche to bypass international human rights obligations. Second, the judgment emphasizes the importance of providing individuals with sufficient information to understand and respond to allegations against them, especially in expulsion proceedings. 

The Court also addressed the applicant’s other allegations under the Convention, including conditions of detention and interference with private and family life, but deemed it unnecessary to examine these separately due to the overarching findings. The ECHR awarded the applicant 5,000 euros for non-pecuniary damage and an equal amount for costs and expenses.

The judgment in Applicant v. Croatia by the ECHR serves as a crucial reminder to states of their obligation to balance national security measures with the procedural rights of individuals. It underscores the role of the ECHR in upholding human rights standards and ensuring that national security does not become a blanket justification for rights violations. This case will undoubtedly influence future legal discourse on the intersection of national security and human rights, particularly in the context of the expulsion of aliens. The case is F.S. v. Croatia.

Tags: CroatiaViolation
Previous Post

The European climate case may be the trial of the decade

Next Post

ECHR to Hold Hearing in Ukraine v. Russia Over Crimea

admin

admin

Next Post
edit post
ECHR to Hold Hearing in Ukraine v. Russia Over Crimea

ECHR to Hold Hearing in Ukraine v. Russia Over Crimea

Newsletter

Stay updated with the ECHR case-law weekly updates.

Only once a week, we promise.

Recent News

edit post
Russia's seats are empty.

Russia did not appear in Court

December 15, 2023
edit post
The Court to Rule on the Right to Strike in Germany

The Court to Rule on the Right to Strike in Germany

December 8, 2023
edit post
ECHR to Hold Hearing in Ukraine v. Russia Over Crimea

ECHR to Hold Hearing in Ukraine v. Russia Over Crimea

December 11, 2023
edit post
Bosnian refugees in Croatia in 1990s.

New Judgment: National Security vs. Rights of Foreigners

December 5, 2023
News ECHR

The News ECHR publishes news and commentary about the European Court of Human Rights and, more broadly, human rights in Europe.

Follow Us

Newsletter

Stay updated with the ECHR case-law weekly updates.

Only once a week, we promise.

© 2022 News ECHR / Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • The News ECHR
  • Case of the Day
  • Your Case
  • Top 50
  • About

© 2022 News ECHR / Privacy Policy and Terms of Use